Thank You Randy! Here is the solution we can all get behind. No flood plain, No toxic gasses, No sinking into the muck lower costs and better services.
posted by Andrew Argenio on 02/16/12 at 6:48 PM
|
Yeah lets just dump a brand new building in the village...and you wonder why people think your against ever getting the current dpw back in order
posted by Steven Calamari on 02/16/12 at 9:32 PM
|
2 days ago Andrew said "Village Trustee Andrew Argenio said he thought abolishing the review board was a step towards consolidation of the town and village." Today he wants to move the village DPW to Mountainville.. Go figure...
posted by Bob Hustwitt on 02/16/12 at 10:00 PM
|
THAT is a totally feasible alternative plan.
The 1973 and 2005 engineering reports clearly stated that the spreader footing foundation that was used for the Shore Rd. building was NOT stable to use at the Shore Road site. Please do not forget 4 feet of flooding this past summer. While the storm might have been a large one, the site is right on the Hudson River. There is no logical reason to chance it happening again.
The tax payers need to ask if it is logical to spend another half million dollars in renovations now, when there are clear indications we will have to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars more in upcoming years.
As far as it being a "brand new" building - We sold the Hudson St. facility when it was only 20 years old, and NOTHING was wrong with it - How is this different?
posted by Melissa Vellone on 02/17/12 at 5:00 PM
|