Cornwall on Hudson photo by Michael Nelson
May 05, 2024
Welcome! Click here to Login
News from Cornwall and Cornwall On Hudson, New York
News
Events
Donate
Our Town
Photos of Our Town
Education
Help Wanted
The Outdoors
Classifieds
Support Our Advertisers
About Us
Advertise with Us
Contact Us
Click to visit the
Official Village Site
Click to visit the
Official Town Site
Cornwall Public Library
Latest Newsletter

General News: AKC Defends Pitbulls in Letter to Village

A bull terrier.
A bull terrier.
A Staffordshire bull terrier.
A Staffordshire bull terrier.
An American pit bull terrier.
An American pit bull terrier.
An American Staffordshire terrier.
An American Staffordshire terrier.
November 19, 2010

By Emily Plaut

The American Kennel Club (AKC) is speaking up in defense of pit bulls that, the group says, are being singled out illegally by a new village law.

At Monday’s village board meeting, Mayor Joseph Gross read a letter from the AKC’s government relations manager stating that the village’s newly adopted animal control law contradicts state law.

The law in question was passed in July by the village board of trustees and requires owners of pit bulls – bull terriers, Staffordshire bull terriers, American pit bull terriers and American Staffordshire terriers -- to post a warning on their property. The law also calls for owners to be fined if they allow their animals to make excessive noise, bite, chase or jump on a person, chase cars, or injure another animal.

The letter from the AKC explains that the state law allows a municipality to enact a program to control dangerous dogs but that “no such program shall regulate such dogs in a manner that is specific to breed.”

The letter goes on to say that breed-specific legislation has not been effective in the past, and that dog ownership responsibility needs to be promoted.

Nationally, two schools of thought exist when it comes to pit bulls. The first school argues that pit bulls are dangerous in nature because they are bred that way. The second view is that dog owners hold responsibility for dangerous dogs.

The AKC’s website states that the AKC “strongly opposes any breed-specific legislation. We support laws that establish a fair process by which specific dogs are identified as "dangerous" based on stated, measurable actions and impose appropriate penalties on irresponsible owners.”

On the other hand, the website DogsBite.org believes that pit bulls are dangerous “due to their selective breeding for dog fighting.”

No action was taken on the issue at the meeting.

The adopted law also requires animal owners to keep their dog, cat or companion animal on a leash and to keep it from defecating or urinating on private or public property unless it is on a leash and the owner cleans up afterward.



Comments:

Wait a sec we paid thousands of dollars to our lawyers to research and advise us and they did not know this state law makes our law illigal. They did not know about this law.No problem for them we will now pay them again to correct there mistake.


posted by Andrew Argenio on 11/19/10 at 10:43 AM

I was bitten by what looks to be a pitbull mix in my COH neighborhood last summer as I was out on a walk. I reported the incident and the owner was notified. Much worse - when my son was a little boy and was in the hospital for an operation, his little roommate was in the hospital because his entire upper lip had been bitten off by a pitbull. They can be wonderful family dogs, but they can be dangerous.


posted by Deborah Mathies on 11/19/10 at 11:04 AM

It is always a shame when someone gets bitten by any breed. Here is a link to a follow-up story that parade magazine did on Michael Vick's dogs. http://www.parade.com/news/2010/09/03-pit-bull-myths.html


posted by Michael McGuirk on 11/19/10 at 12:27 PM

Many dogs can be dangerous. I have a pit mix. She was bit by a yorkie... no joke... and did nothing to defend herself. My two year old daughter will torture this poor dog and get nothing in return but mournful eyes. My dog as a little girl was actually eaten by a German shepherd. Breed is not indicative of aggression.


posted by Carrie Furman on 11/19/10 at 12:38 PM

Interesting, Carrie. My two and a half year old terrorizes our dog also. It is interesting to note that our son loves the Lawrence Farms huge bull mastif dog, "Buddy" but is petrified of little dogs.


posted by Michael McGuirk on 11/19/10 at 12:45 PM

Owners know their dog - and should be held responsible. Like the one next door to me with the 20' leash and no means of picking up after the dog - I watched her let the dog go on my boat trailer..


posted by Robert Langston on 11/19/10 at 7:29 PM

Just a random thought...Florida completely outlawed pitbulls! Decided because of so many documented attacks, that State-wide, no pitbulls were allowed.


posted by Eric Shore on 11/20/10 at 2:31 AM

Absolute nonsense. Florida has no more outlawed pit bulls than New York has outlawed golden labs. God help us when people keep posting utter falsehoods, then people read them and think, "Well, it was on the Internet, it must be true..."


posted by Stephan Wilkinson on 11/20/10 at 9:13 AM

"Miami-Dade County, Florida, enacted a ban on pit bulls after an 8-year-old girl was mauled by one of the dogs in 1989. According to the Lakeland, Florida Ledger newspaper, state law prohibits communities from implementing breed-specific laws. However, Miami-Dade was grandfathered in and it is still the only municipality that bans pit bulls." Many other Florida cities have since passed similiar laws..current pitbull owners are usually grandfathered.


posted by Eric Shore on 11/21/10 at 11:22 PM

Miami-Dade County isn't "Florida." It's IN Florida.


posted by Stephan Wilkinson on 11/22/10 at 7:56 AM

Way back when it was German Shepherds everyone was afraid of. Then it was Dobermans. There's always some poor dog that is being punished for having an irresponsible owner. If Pitbulls and Pitbull mixes are so terrible, then why are so many used as therapy dogs?


posted by Annette Boyle on 11/22/10 at 2:12 PM

What is so terrible about posting a sign and punishing those that can't handle their animal?? Get over yourself, AKC.

I suggest that all breeds of dog with a factually based history of aggression should be registered, chips implanted in them for record keeping, and tracked by the local animal control officer at least once a year. (at the owners expense)

Gun owners must register their guns. Boxers must register as professional fighters, etc. Why not enforce the registration system currently in place and make it more specific to any aggressive breed regardless of others opinions?

I don't agree that just pitbulls should be singled out but in a small community, any potentially dangerous animals should be accounted for and the fines for failure to register your animal should be in the thousands if not adhered to..... with all fines going to offset the animal control dept.


posted by Jake Williams on 11/22/10 at 4:43 PM

Thank you, Bill, for providing me with a good belly laugh. At no point was my post political or was it intended to add more government into our lives. Get off the soap box and come back down to earth with the rest of us, please.

If we have laws in place, they are not enforced. If there is a question about safety, then it needs to be addressed. I did not call for registering all animals, you made that insane leap to over-emphasize your politically motivated point.

You have the right to get any animal you want..... but why not tigers? Why not lions? Why not let those crazy teenagers you mentioned own horses and ride them down main st??? You can't have any animal you want, so what is the intrinsic difference with an aggressive pitbull and a bad owner?

Freedom isn't free. It never has been. Security such as police, fire code officials and the evil gov't keep you from doing whatever you want when obvious safety concerns enter the equation. And your type will be the first to bash the mayor, or governor, or president if and when something goes wrong that could have been easily avoided with those pesky, annoying, laws.


posted by Jake Williams on 11/23/10 at 2:53 PM

In 2014, the U.S. National Safety Council showed that your chances of dying by a dog bite are 1 in 116,448. That?s just a number though; to put that number into perspective, your chances of dying by legal execution are pretty similar, 1 in 127,717. You are, in fact, twice as likely to die by a hornet, bee or wasp sting than a dog, 1 in 55,764. In the midst of the mudslinging, we miss the critical opportunity to educate children on dog bite prevention, to advocate for effective dangerous dog ordinances that are breed neutral but give animal control officers the tools to do their jobs and keep communities safe.hout dog bites or risks, nor will we ever live in a world without irresponsible people. We can, though, live in a world where dogs are judged as individuals and by their actions rather than their appearance, and owners are held accountable for the actions of their dogs.


posted by sue who on 10/05/16 at 2:34 PM

Add a Comment:

Please signup or login to add a comment.



© 2024 by Cornwall Media, LLC . All Rights Reserved. | photo credit: Michael Nelson
Advertise with Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy